[ossig] Say "NO" to OOXML as an ISO Standard

[nicholas]

Would any one know how we can check out other comments made? I can only see the latest petition signatures.

-- 
Nicholas A. Suppiah

---------- Original Message -----------
From: Hasannudin Saidin <hasan at my.ibm.com> 
To: ossig at mncc.com.my 
Sent: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:23:51 +0800 
Subject: Re: [ossig] Say "NO" to OOXML as an ISO Standard

> Ha ha... even the original text of the petition had it wrong (as I copy and pasted earlier), then they corrected it some 5,000 signatures later!
> 
> Malaysia has over 30 people signed as at afternoon of Tuesday, 26 June. Think we can double that by the end of this week? Or more?
> 
> Cheers!
>

> 
> HASAN (Hasannudin Saidin) 
> Open Malaysia blog (http://www.openmalaysiablog.com)   Click:
>

> Raja Iskandar Shah <ris.riscniaga at time.net.my>
> 
>

Raja Iskandar Shah <ris.riscniaga at time.net.my> 
> Sent by: ossig-bounces at mncc.com.my
> 06/26/2007 11:56 PM

> Please respond to
> ossig at mncc.com.my

> 
> To  
> ossig at mncc.com.my

> 
> cc  
>

> 
> Subject  
> Re: [ossig] Say "NO" to OOXML as an ISO Standard

> mistake !
> 
> it should be office open xml and not open office xml !
> 
> Raja Iskandar Shah wrote:
> > imho,
> >
> > ms use of the open office xml (ooxml) term is intentionally used to 
> > confuse (aghh.. me confused me words)
> >
> > when open office xml or ooxml is mentioned, people who are vaguely 
> > familiar with the subject will immediately think openoffice.org (i had 
> > that misconception when i read the subject of this email).
> >
> > anyway, i signed the petition.
> >
> >
> > Hasannudin Saidin wrote:
> >>
> >> From Open Malaysia <http://www.openmalaysiablog.com> blog:

------- End of Original Message -------
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/ossig_mncc.com.my/attachments/20070628/5f54ecb0/attachment.html